The State of the Union address’s historical past, explained

The State of the Union tackle appears like a really outdated American ritual, and it’s. Yet many of its options that we take as a right in the present day have been the truth is added by revolutionary presidents who determined to shake issues up — typically for very idiosyncratic causes.

There was Thomas Jefferson, who delivered the speech solely in writing— maybe as a result of he was a horrible public speaker. There was Woodrow Wilson, who put his political science theories on presidential rhetoric into observe by reviving the in-person speech. And there was Ronald Reagan, who took benefit of tv to point out off particular friends sitting in the crowd.

So whereas President Joe Biden prepares for a well-known routine — standing in entrance of the vp and the House speaker to supply his tackle the state of America — this is a rundown of how massively the speech has really modified over time.

1) Thomas Jefferson began a 112-year custom of giving the message solely in writing — and his stage fright could have been an element

For the first 12 years of the United States, Presidents George Washington and John Adams delivered the president’s message very like in the present day’s presidents do — they traveled to Congress and gave an oral speech to them. (Throughout most of US historical past, what we now know as the State of the Union tackle was known as the president’s annual message.)

But when Thomas Jefferson took workplace in 1801, he determined to alter issues — and ship solely a written message reasonably than going to provide a speech. Publicly, he stated that such a change would take up much less of the legislators’ time, and forestall them from feeling pressured to give you their very own response. The spectacle of a president addressing Congress had additionally appeared to some Republicans “altogether too reminiscent of the monarch’s speech from the throne at the opening of Parliament,” wrote historian Daniel Walker Howe.

However, a 1995 article by Gerhard Casper, then president of Stanford University, argues that Jefferson could have had a extra private purpose to make the change — his shyness. Casper writes:

“By forgoing the theatrics of the presidential tackle, Jefferson by the way averted the private embarrassment of struggling his infamous stage fright. Jefferson was ‘an anxious orator,’ guttural and inarticulate, whose first inaugural tackle was delivered ‘at such a whisper that the majority in attendance couldn’t hear a world he stated.'”

Casper concludes that Jefferson’s resolution was in all probability partly based mostly on a real want for reform “that was aligned with self-interested want to keep away from public talking.”

2) When Woodrow Wilson revived the in-person speech to Congress in 1913, Washington, DC, was astonished

Universal History Archive/UIG/Getty Images

For over a century, each president would comply with Jefferson’s instance, and ship solely a written annual message to Congress. But a younger political scientist by the identify of Woodrow Wilson wasn’t satisfied. Wilson had lengthy been eager about how presidential rhetoric could possibly be extra successfully used, and in 1889, Wilson wrote that Jefferson ought to by no means have made the swap, since an oral presidential message may have allowed a “extra public and accountable interchange of opinion between the Executive and Congress.”

When Wilson himself turned president in 1913, he had the alternative to place his concepts into motion. As a particular session of Congress was about to start that April, Wilson determined that he’d tackle them personally to advertise his agenda. “The announcement surprised official Washington,” Robert Kraig wrote in a book on Wilson. Kraig writes {that a} modern press account portrayed Congress as “astonished,” and that even members of Wilson’s Cabinet doubted the knowledge of the transfer.

But the speech — which technically wasn’t an “annual message” — went over effectively, and press protection was constructive. So when the conventional time for Wilson’s first message arrived in December, he delivered that as an in-person speech too. He’d ship 5 extra in-person annual messages, earlier than reverting to written messages for his last two as a result of unhealthy well being. Presidents Coolidge and Hoover would revert to largely written messages, however FDR would make an in-person — and nationally broadcast — speech the norm.

3) The “State of the Union tackle” is a reasonably latest renaming of the president’s message

Hulton Archive/Getty Images

Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution says that the president shall “sometimes give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and suggest to their Consideration such Measures as he shall choose mandatory and expedient.” But for practically a century and a half, that catchy time period “State of the Union” wasn’t used as a title, with the extra anodyne “annual message” most well-liked as a substitute.

It was FDR who began giving the time period “state of the union” elevated prominence, notably beginning in January 1942, shortly after the US entrance into World War II. According to the House of Representatives clerk’s office, FDR’s speech then “started to be informally known as the ‘state of the Union’ message/tackle.” A couple of years later, President Truman formally named it the “State of the Union Address,” and that identify has caught since.

4) Ronald Reagan began the observe of inviting particular friends

In January 1982, a airplane crashed into Washington, DC’s 14th Street Bridge and fell into the Potomac River, killing 78 folks. In the chaos, Congressional Budget Office worker Lenny Skutnik jumped into the river and helped rescue a passenger. So the Reagan Administration invited Skutnik to the State of the Union tackle two weeks later — the place the president personally praised him for his heroism. Members of Congress gave him a standing ovation, as TV cameras panned over to Skutnik (one caption learn: “Plane Crash Hero”).

Reagan and future presidents would quickly increase this observe to incorporate not simply heroes, however strange Americans whose tales (and faces) may assist illustrate one of the speech’s factors. DC wags would quickly dub these friends “Skutniks.” In the phrases of reporter Jeff Greenfield, “A skutnik is a human prop, utilized by a speaker to make a political level.”

5) The State of the Union tackle can actually matter — particularly if overseas coverage is the focus

Political pundits typically exaggerate how influential presidential speeches will be. The president has little energy to alter congressional minds and win assist for controversial payments with rhetoric alone. Even the public will not doubtless transfer a lot — in accordance with Gallup’s Jeffrey Jones, State of the Union speeches “hardly ever have an effect on a president’s public standing in a significant means, regardless of the quantity of consideration they obtain.”

But some have actually stood the check of time — notably those who sign a serious change in overseas coverage, the place the president has extra room to behave on his personal.

Back in December 1823, President James Monroe used his seventh annual message to announce that American continents have been “to not be thought of as topics for future colonization by any European powers.” This, of course, turned referred to as the Monroe Doctrine, and have become a cornerstone of American overseas coverage for hundreds of years. (Secretary of State John Kerry just recently disavowed it in November 2013.)

In January 1941, FDR made an analogous assertion by itemizing “Four Freedoms” that the US would defend throughout the world — freedom of speech, freedom of faith, freedom from need, and freedom from concern. American dedication to these rules was, of course, inconsistent. But the Allies adopted them as their battle goals, and after the battle, Eleanor Roosevelt labored to make sure the new United Nations would voice assist for the freedoms.

And a broadly famous State of the Union in latest occasions was George W. Bush’s tackle of January 2002 — the first one delivered after 9/11. In it, he named an “axis of evil” consisting of North Korea, Iran, and Iraq — the final of which he spent the most time on. He stated these states have been pursuing weapons of mass destruction and have been allied with terrorists, and vowed: “America will do what is important to make sure our Nation’s safety.” Bush biographer Peter Baker called it “maybe the most memorable line of his presidency,” and it is clear that the seeds of the Iraq War have been planted in that speech.

Update, February 6, 2023: This article was initially printed in 2015. It has been up to date for more moderen State of the Union addresses.